.
Feedback

CL&P Draws the Repair Line at the 'Quick Fix' Following Snowstorm

CL&P will not charge property owners for 'quick fixes' that crews working for the utility company made to non-utility equipment to get as many customers back on line as quickly as possible.

 

After the recent October snowstorm that caused widespread damage to the electrical grid along streets and in private property, questions arose as to who, the homeowner or the electric company, owned what and therefore was responsible for fixing it.

Everything that is part of the electric service along the street, the service wire to the house and where it attaches and the meter in Connecticut are maintained by Connecticut Light and Power Co. and United Illuminating Co. depending on each company’s service area as carved out by state regulators. Everything else related to the electric service is owned by the property owner, whether it is residential, commercial, business or government.

“Primarily we did the service wire,” CL&P spokesman Mitch Gross said Tuesday. CL&P crews and the private contractors hired by the utility to restore service would, however, do the “quick fix” of what otherwise is considered a homeowner’s property if it could get a customer back on line quickly and safely.

“If they went beyond that (the service wire and meter) it would be a quick fix,” Gross said, adding that what constituted a quick fix was a decision left to the field crews to make.

Beyond that, fixing wires that had been ripped off the side of a house or building were the responsibility of the property owner who had to hire a certified electrician to make the repairs before CL&P would reconnect the service.

Gross said property owners should check their insurance coverage to see if damage to the electrical service is covered by their property insurance. Some policies cover storm-related damage including food spoilage, but it depends on how the policy is written.

Gross said utility customers would not be charged for the “quick fix” repairs.

More extensive repairs are ultimately the property owner’s responsibility to make and pay for, Gross said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tolland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
q May 21, 2013 at 01:25 pm
"Minimal impact" means some. Retiring debts over the next few years is a good thing andRead More doesn't mean you should borrow more. Perhaps when those debts are paid off there will be a little more money available to meet the basic needs of the schools and the town departments. As wonderful as the expansion sounds, it is not an immediate need - it is a "want". We know the potential benefits of the expansion. Please give specifics as to the cost per taxpayer per year and for how long to pay off this specific project. Thank you.
Betty-Lou Griffin May 21, 2013 at 11:48 am
The "complete reworking of the library" only included HVAC renovations being done on theRead More whole building, repair of the leaking roof and skylight that was ruining the library, and replacement of the circulation desk. No space was added. I am glad to hear that you recognize the benefits of expanded library space. Town Manager Steven Werbner has indicated that Tolland will be retiring several debts over the next several years, and this expansion would therefore have minimal impact on Tolland's debt burden or tax level. If we wait, multiple existing grant opportunities may disappear. Let's NOT wait another decade to address this problem. Let's at least send it to public hearing and referendum so that we can have a sincere and wide-reaching community discussion on this important issue, and allow our citizens the OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.
q May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
Love the idea of an expanded library space, but is the time really now? We couldn't even afford toRead More fully fund our school and town budgets for next year. We will be experiencing a lower quality of education and reduced town services and until we can bring that back up to par we should not be taking on new debt. Just a quick look at next year's budget shows we are still paying on the new High School, the Geothermal project, bonding for roads improvement, sewers, open space bonds, Cross Farms development, the new Library roof, and now the artificial turf/lights project at THS. Even if some grants are available to help with the cost, the Library Expansion Project will add more debt for the town (taxpayers). Is this really the time to do that?
q May 21, 2013 at 10:10 am
Love the idea of an expanded library, but we saw with this latest school/town budget that this townRead More cannot afford to maintain the level of education and town services we now have. How much will this library extension cost per year per taxpayer? Perhaps we should pay off some of our existing debt (including all the new debt incurred in just the past 3 years) before taking on new. Also, you mention the need for quiet tutoring rooms. Are these paid tutors you're referring to? If so, will they be charged rental fees for using the spaces paid for by the taxpayers? Aren't there spaces available at the new Rec Center at Parker? How about space at the schools? With fewer teachers and fewer students there are now empty classrooms.