.
Feedback

Connecticut Officials Fighting Proposed Electric Rate Increase

The company that supplies New England states with power wants a 10 percent rate hike.

Connecticut leaders are opposing a request by ISO-New England, the company that runs New England's power grid, for a nearly 10 percent rate increase. If approved, that increase could translate into a hike in rates for Connecticut electric customers.

Officials here are joining forces with their counterparts in Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Maine to oppose ISO-New England's rate request. In a recent letter to the Federal Energery Regulatory Commission, Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, Consumer Counsel Elin Katz and Public Utilities Regulatory Authority Chairman Arthur House, along with officials from the the three other states, call the rate request "unjust and unreasonable."

“Connecticut’s electric rates are among the highest in the nation. FERC needs to determine why ISO-NE seeks to increase its burden on ratepayers by nearly 10 percent, when electricity demand is flat or declining,” Jepsen said in a press release about the states' opposition. “Connecticut and other New England states should have the opportunity to review the ISO-NE budget and provide input on whether the agency is acting reasonably to control costs,” he said.

In their letter to the commission, the officials also said that ISO-New England has gotten several rate increases in recent years at a time when it has boosted salaries for some of its highest paid officials and increasead its staff. 

"This growth has been permitted to continue even through periods of economic lag and recession when other regulated and unregulated companies have frozen or reduced costs and staffing levels," the officials said in their letter to the commission. "ISO-NE’s budget has grown exponentially, seemingly without regard to poor economic conditions that have required all other regulated and unregulated public utilities to control, limit or reduce costs and staffing levels."

You can read a PDF of the letter above.

ISO-New England's requested operating budget for 2013 is about $165 million, a nearly 9.3 percent increase over its current year budget of $151 million, state officials said in a press release. Its budget has increased 34 percent over the past four years and its roster of full-time employees has increased from 180 in 1997 to 563 proposed for 2013. The company employs 40 percent more employees than all of the public utility commissions in New England combined, state officials said, and the firm's employees last year received merit bonuses of about 9 percent per employee.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tolland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
q May 21, 2013 at 01:25 pm
"Minimal impact" means some. Retiring debts over the next few years is a good thing andRead More doesn't mean you should borrow more. Perhaps when those debts are paid off there will be a little more money available to meet the basic needs of the schools and the town departments. As wonderful as the expansion sounds, it is not an immediate need - it is a "want". We know the potential benefits of the expansion. Please give specifics as to the cost per taxpayer per year and for how long to pay off this specific project. Thank you.
Betty-Lou Griffin May 21, 2013 at 11:48 am
The "complete reworking of the library" only included HVAC renovations being done on theRead More whole building, repair of the leaking roof and skylight that was ruining the library, and replacement of the circulation desk. No space was added. I am glad to hear that you recognize the benefits of expanded library space. Town Manager Steven Werbner has indicated that Tolland will be retiring several debts over the next several years, and this expansion would therefore have minimal impact on Tolland's debt burden or tax level. If we wait, multiple existing grant opportunities may disappear. Let's NOT wait another decade to address this problem. Let's at least send it to public hearing and referendum so that we can have a sincere and wide-reaching community discussion on this important issue, and allow our citizens the OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.
q May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
Love the idea of an expanded library space, but is the time really now? We couldn't even afford toRead More fully fund our school and town budgets for next year. We will be experiencing a lower quality of education and reduced town services and until we can bring that back up to par we should not be taking on new debt. Just a quick look at next year's budget shows we are still paying on the new High School, the Geothermal project, bonding for roads improvement, sewers, open space bonds, Cross Farms development, the new Library roof, and now the artificial turf/lights project at THS. Even if some grants are available to help with the cost, the Library Expansion Project will add more debt for the town (taxpayers). Is this really the time to do that?
q May 21, 2013 at 10:10 am
Love the idea of an expanded library, but we saw with this latest school/town budget that this townRead More cannot afford to maintain the level of education and town services we now have. How much will this library extension cost per year per taxpayer? Perhaps we should pay off some of our existing debt (including all the new debt incurred in just the past 3 years) before taking on new. Also, you mention the need for quiet tutoring rooms. Are these paid tutors you're referring to? If so, will they be charged rental fees for using the spaces paid for by the taxpayers? Aren't there spaces available at the new Rec Center at Parker? How about space at the schools? With fewer teachers and fewer students there are now empty classrooms.