.
Feedback

Everything in Moderation. Really??? Everything???

"Everything in Moderation" is a line we use to feel less guilty about our food choices. Let's examine this topic and clarify some misconceptions.

We hear the phrase “Everything in Moderation” quite often and it sounds like it makes sense.  It seems to makes sense because too much of something or not enough of something is probably not good. When I think of “moderation” what comes to mind is: “every now and then”, “not too often”, “not too much” and “once in a while”.  All that seems to make sense…

I find it amazing however, that in actuality we don’t like moderation in most areas of our lives.

Do you expect a moderately decent job from your car mechanic? How
about your child’s teacher showing up for work every now and then?  What about drugs? (Would you accept: “I am just going to use Ecstasy and Vicodin in moderation” from your child?)  Seat belts in moderation?  Helmets? Dare I ask about physical abuse? Crime?


All of a sudden moderation doesn’t sound so great, right?


So why do we insist that it makes total sense when it comes to food?  I have never heard anyone say: “I eat broccoli in moderation” or spinach or apples.  When we eat the foods we know we should be eating and that are good for us, we don’t have to say anything. We just eat it and move on.


But when we make food choices we are not very proud of, the need for an excuse suddenly comes up to the surface.  Junk food is by far the biggest contributor to our “moderation” scheme.   Since nutrient depleted, calorie rich food-like substances come in variety of shapes, colors and textures, and since they hide under many different names , it’s very easy to fall victim to our own moderation diet plan.


If you eat chips on Mondays, cheetoes on Tuesdays, drink soda on Wednesdays etc…  you might actually be feeling good about  your ability to moderate your intake of  each individual kind of junk food.  However, if you step back and look at the totality of your weekly intake of chemicalized, processed empty calories you might see a very different picture.


Let’s look at an even bigger picture. In the USA an average person gets about 60 % of their daily calories from added fat, added sugar and processed grains.  Only about 15 % of calories on average come from nutrient rich vegetables, fruits, whole grains and legumes.


Additionally, in a country where  close to half the population dies  prematurely of heart disease,  and where cancer rates are approaching a staggering  1 out of 3 people,  maybe moderation isn’t such a great idea.   Do we want to have heart attacks  “every now and then”?  Diabetes “not too often”? “Not too much” obesity?  How about cancer “in moderation”?

Since the link between the Standard American Diet and the top killers of American people has long been established and proven, maybe it’s time we start calling things what they are and treat them accordingly.  

Junk belongs in the garbage, food belongs in our bodies.


Edible food-like substances belong… you decide.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gvlLwzydc_A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G96Sztb8Ctk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQNNX2Oo7Kk



Iwona Leger, RN, MSN, Health Coach, owns Love and Peas Health Coaching and runs individual and group health coaching sessions. She is very passionate about disease prevention, lifestyle and diet modifications, as well as stress reduction techniques.

For more info visit www.loveandpeashealth.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tolland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Colleen Szemreylo May 25, 2013 at 08:09 pm
Call me at 8608788078 or email me at colleenszemreylo@gmail.com Thank you so much Colleen
Bob Rubino May 25, 2013 at 05:11 pm
Colleen, members of the Tolland Camera Club would like to help out with your event. Who can weRead More contact to help? Bob Rubino
q May 24, 2013 at 03:24 pm
Thank you for taking the time to respond. Your answer regarding the importance of having a largerRead More meeting space at the library makes sense. I have long felt that our library was inadequate and an expansion makes more sense than a new building. I am concerned, though, whether this is the right time for us to be taking on new debt when we can't properly fund our schools. I hope more detailed information will be available soon. Thank you again.
Kate Farrish May 24, 2013 at 01:11 pm
These are good questions. We're gathering more information to have available for Tuesday's councilRead More meeting, so we can answer questions 1 and 3 then (if not before). As to question 2, I know the many grants that the Friends of the Library and the Tolland Public Library Foundation give to the library must be used to benefit the library (for example, under conditions of the bequest the Foundation received a few years ago). While there is arguably space in other buildings, these grants must be used in most cases to support programs held at the library. Due to space limitations at the library, the Foundation has in a pinch held programs at the high school and senior center, but we don't like to do that because one aim of the events is to have more people come to and use the town library. Thank you for your questions and interest in the project, Kate Farrish Secretary, Tolland Public Library Foundation
q May 24, 2013 at 10:28 am
1)Again, we see "minimal impact" on taxes. If no grants are received, what would theRead More actual cost be per year for taxpayers and how long would we be paying for the expansion? We are still paying on several other large projects for which millions were borrowed. The project sounds great, but annual cost is an important factor. Our schools and town services are not currently being adequately funded, so I am concerned about obligating taxpayers to a new expense which could take more away from schools and town services in future budgets. 2)Lack of space for large meetings is one of the reasons given for expanding the library. Could space in the existing schools be used for large meetings? How about space at Parker School which is now housing rec programs? 3) Would the $400,000 grant for an accessible elevator still be available if only that project is done at this time?
q May 21, 2013 at 01:25 pm
"Minimal impact" means some. Retiring debts over the next few years is a good thing andRead More doesn't mean you should borrow more. Perhaps when those debts are paid off there will be a little more money available to meet the basic needs of the schools and the town departments. As wonderful as the expansion sounds, it is not an immediate need - it is a "want". We know the potential benefits of the expansion. Please give specifics as to the cost per taxpayer per year and for how long to pay off this specific project. Thank you.
Betty-Lou Griffin May 21, 2013 at 11:48 am
The "complete reworking of the library" only included HVAC renovations being done on theRead More whole building, repair of the leaking roof and skylight that was ruining the library, and replacement of the circulation desk. No space was added. I am glad to hear that you recognize the benefits of expanded library space. Town Manager Steven Werbner has indicated that Tolland will be retiring several debts over the next several years, and this expansion would therefore have minimal impact on Tolland's debt burden or tax level. If we wait, multiple existing grant opportunities may disappear. Let's NOT wait another decade to address this problem. Let's at least send it to public hearing and referendum so that we can have a sincere and wide-reaching community discussion on this important issue, and allow our citizens the OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.
q May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
Love the idea of an expanded library space, but is the time really now? We couldn't even afford toRead More fully fund our school and town budgets for next year. We will be experiencing a lower quality of education and reduced town services and until we can bring that back up to par we should not be taking on new debt. Just a quick look at next year's budget shows we are still paying on the new High School, the Geothermal project, bonding for roads improvement, sewers, open space bonds, Cross Farms development, the new Library roof, and now the artificial turf/lights project at THS. Even if some grants are available to help with the cost, the Library Expansion Project will add more debt for the town (taxpayers). Is this really the time to do that?
q May 21, 2013 at 10:10 am
Love the idea of an expanded library, but we saw with this latest school/town budget that this townRead More cannot afford to maintain the level of education and town services we now have. How much will this library extension cost per year per taxpayer? Perhaps we should pay off some of our existing debt (including all the new debt incurred in just the past 3 years) before taking on new. Also, you mention the need for quiet tutoring rooms. Are these paid tutors you're referring to? If so, will they be charged rental fees for using the spaces paid for by the taxpayers? Aren't there spaces available at the new Rec Center at Parker? How about space at the schools? With fewer teachers and fewer students there are now empty classrooms.