.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Campbell Farmland

Members of the Campbell family discuss their viewpoint on the Campbell Peaceful Valley Farm.

Dear Tax Paying Residents of Tolland:

You may have noticed a story in Tolland Patch, some green signs up around town, or, most recently, a notice on the “Reader’s Page” in the Journal Inquirer stating that the preservation of the farmland at Campbell’s Peaceful Valley Farm is in jeopardy.  As children of Clarence and Beatrice Campbell, we would like to share some facts with all of you who are residents of the Town of Tolland.  Please keep in mind our statements are based on knowing our parents intentions well since we were involved in the discussions at the time of their selling their land to Tolland and from working on the farm alongside our father for most of our lives.

Our parents wanted the 13+ acre section of farmland as well as the 70+/- acres of open space to be used for all to enjoy in perpetuity.  Each and every one of you has a right to use both parcels of land, be it the 13 acres which was purchased with your tax dollars for “municipal/recreational use” as the sale agreement states or the open space parcel.  Their desire was to share the beautiful scenery, views, and trails with everyone.

At the July 24th Town Council meeting, the Council members tabled a resolution to transfer the lifetime farming use from our mother to another person because they had your best interests in mind.  They could not, in good judgment, make a decision on a resolution which did not present all the documentation associated with it.  For example, after reviewing documents, the Council members learned that the initial purchase agreement between our parents and the Town of Tolland clearly stated the lifetime ‘lease to farm’ could not be “sold, sublet, or otherwise transferred”.  Our parents had lifetime use of the 13 acres with the barn because, at the time of the sale, our father still had cattle and was raising corn for feed. 

Our father stopped farming years prior to his passing in 2009. Since our mother, Beatrice Campbell, no longer wished to farm, she sold the farming equipment and asked her daughter Debra to remove the remaining animals to prepare the property for Town use.  

Conserving Tolland is proposing the Town allow one person to hold the ‘lease to farm’ for this land.  We question how this honors the intent of our parents who believed the land should be used to best serve all the residents of Tolland, not just a limited few.  Presently, there are ‘keep out/private property’ signs on this farmland which is not private.  It belongs to you, the people of Tolland.  You are not allowed to go on this property although it belongs to the Town.  Is this truly the best use of town land?  It is NOT how our parents envisioned it being used.

We would like to propose that the residents of Tolland put forth ideas to the Council where all town residents may benefit from the use of this land.  One Tolland resident has suggested  a Tolland Community Garden where people can grow their own food, teach their children about gardening, and share with other residents what a ‘community’ truly is. . . working together for a mutually agreed upon cause. 

This property was designated by our parents for the use and enjoyment of all Tolland residents.  Let’s keep it that way.

Sincerely,

Barbara Campbell Gracie, David Campbell, Debra Campbell

Children of Clarence and Beatrice Campbell

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tolland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
q May 24, 2013 at 03:24 pm
Thank you for taking the time to respond. Your answer regarding the importance of having a largerRead More meeting space at the library makes sense. I have long felt that our library was inadequate and an expansion makes more sense than a new building. I am concerned, though, whether this is the right time for us to be taking on new debt when we can't properly fund our schools. I hope more detailed information will be available soon. Thank you again.
Kate Farrish May 24, 2013 at 01:11 pm
These are good questions. We're gathering more information to have available for Tuesday's councilRead More meeting, so we can answer questions 1 and 3 then (if not before). As to question 2, I know the many grants that the Friends of the Library and the Tolland Public Library Foundation give to the library must be used to benefit the library (for example, under conditions of the bequest the Foundation received a few years ago). While there is arguably space in other buildings, these grants must be used in most cases to support programs held at the library. Due to space limitations at the library, the Foundation has in a pinch held programs at the high school and senior center, but we don't like to do that because one aim of the events is to have more people come to and use the town library. Thank you for your questions and interest in the project, Kate Farrish Secretary, Tolland Public Library Foundation
q May 24, 2013 at 10:28 am
1)Again, we see "minimal impact" on taxes. If no grants are received, what would theRead More actual cost be per year for taxpayers and how long would we be paying for the expansion? We are still paying on several other large projects for which millions were borrowed. The project sounds great, but annual cost is an important factor. Our schools and town services are not currently being adequately funded, so I am concerned about obligating taxpayers to a new expense which could take more away from schools and town services in future budgets. 2)Lack of space for large meetings is one of the reasons given for expanding the library. Could space in the existing schools be used for large meetings? How about space at Parker School which is now housing rec programs? 3) Would the $400,000 grant for an accessible elevator still be available if only that project is done at this time?
q May 21, 2013 at 01:25 pm
"Minimal impact" means some. Retiring debts over the next few years is a good thing andRead More doesn't mean you should borrow more. Perhaps when those debts are paid off there will be a little more money available to meet the basic needs of the schools and the town departments. As wonderful as the expansion sounds, it is not an immediate need - it is a "want". We know the potential benefits of the expansion. Please give specifics as to the cost per taxpayer per year and for how long to pay off this specific project. Thank you.
Betty-Lou Griffin May 21, 2013 at 11:48 am
The "complete reworking of the library" only included HVAC renovations being done on theRead More whole building, repair of the leaking roof and skylight that was ruining the library, and replacement of the circulation desk. No space was added. I am glad to hear that you recognize the benefits of expanded library space. Town Manager Steven Werbner has indicated that Tolland will be retiring several debts over the next several years, and this expansion would therefore have minimal impact on Tolland's debt burden or tax level. If we wait, multiple existing grant opportunities may disappear. Let's NOT wait another decade to address this problem. Let's at least send it to public hearing and referendum so that we can have a sincere and wide-reaching community discussion on this important issue, and allow our citizens the OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.
q May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
Love the idea of an expanded library space, but is the time really now? We couldn't even afford toRead More fully fund our school and town budgets for next year. We will be experiencing a lower quality of education and reduced town services and until we can bring that back up to par we should not be taking on new debt. Just a quick look at next year's budget shows we are still paying on the new High School, the Geothermal project, bonding for roads improvement, sewers, open space bonds, Cross Farms development, the new Library roof, and now the artificial turf/lights project at THS. Even if some grants are available to help with the cost, the Library Expansion Project will add more debt for the town (taxpayers). Is this really the time to do that?
q May 21, 2013 at 10:10 am
Love the idea of an expanded library, but we saw with this latest school/town budget that this townRead More cannot afford to maintain the level of education and town services we now have. How much will this library extension cost per year per taxpayer? Perhaps we should pay off some of our existing debt (including all the new debt incurred in just the past 3 years) before taking on new. Also, you mention the need for quiet tutoring rooms. Are these paid tutors you're referring to? If so, will they be charged rental fees for using the spaces paid for by the taxpayers? Aren't there spaces available at the new Rec Center at Parker? How about space at the schools? With fewer teachers and fewer students there are now empty classrooms.